Insights
Hardware

By Rachel Connett
7 min read

In August, I quoted three Lenovo server configurations. When I revisited those quotes in late October, the prices had increased by 27%, 23%, and 53%. Changes of that size can put a project back into budget discussions, particularly when the original estimates have already gone through an approval process. They also illustrate something we are seeing regularly: the price an organization uses to plan a purchase may be quite different from the price available when it is ready to order.
Since we published The Hardware Crisis Report, pressure on hardware pricing and availability has continued, although the impact varies considerably by product and configuration. Servers, memory, enterprise storage, and graphics cards remain particular concerns. For businesses planning a technology refresh, the priority is to check older estimates, understand potential supply constraints, and leave enough time to evaluate alternatives before the equipment becomes urgently needed.
What we are seeing in hardware quotes
The server increases were the most striking examples from October, but they were not isolated. We also saw changes in workstation and desktop component pricing that could affect refresh budgets, especially when multiplied across a larger purchase.
Hardware | Recent USI purchasing observation |
|---|---|
Three Lenovo server configurations | Requoted in late October at 27%, 23%, and 53% above their August quotes |
One Lenovo ThinkPad P16v configuration | Increased 8% between October 1 and October 28 |
32GB desktop RAM | Pricing we were tracking increased approximately 13% in the final week of October |
The P16v configuration included an Intel Core Ultra 7 processor, 64GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD, and RTX PRO 1000 graphics. These examples reflect specific configurations and purchasing conditions, rather than average increases across all Lenovo systems or memory products. They show why current pricing for the equipment in your plan is more useful than applying a general percentage increase to last quarter’s budget.
Servers have generally seen greater pressure than standard desktops in our recent quoting. Their larger memory and storage requirements create more exposure to components whose costs are rising, although each configuration needs to be reviewed individually. The desktops we are tracking have seen less overall movement, with RAM accounting for much of the increase. A routine desktop refresh and a memory-intensive server project therefore need different budget assumptions, even when they are being purchased at the same time.
Why memory and storage remain under pressure
Industry research provides context for those changes. In its September 30 outlook, TrendForce projected fourth-quarter contract price increases of 10–15% for conventional DRAM and 15–20% for NAND flash. The firm also reported that suppliers continued prioritizing server products and expected enterprise SSD price increases to accelerate compared with the previous quarter. Those forecasts describe component markets and should not be applied directly to the price of a complete computer or server. They do, however, help explain why slower increases in some categories have yet to translate into lower purchase prices.
Availability is creating additional complications. Distributors have told us they are competing for limited RAM and storage inventory, with purchases tied to identified customer projects receiving priority over orders intended to replenish general stock. Sharing quantities, required delivery dates, and acceptable alternatives earlier gives your hardware partner a clearer requirement to work with when checking supply. It also creates time to investigate another purchasing option if the preferred configuration cannot meet the project schedule.
Check the complete configuration before committing to a timeline
Memory and storage are only part of the availability picture. Our supply-channel conversations indicate limited availability for Intel Xeon 6 and previous-generation Xeon Scalable processors, while ASUS has advised us of limited stock across its RTX 5050 through RTX 5090 graphics card range. Intel’s third-quarter results reinforce the broader server processor concern: the company identified expanding Xeon supply to meet strong demand as an immediate priority. That supports planning carefully around processor availability, although it does not establish a delivery timeline for any particular system.
Finding a server chassis, processor, or graphics card in stock is only one step toward confirming that a system can ship. Compatible memory, storage, network adapters, and other required components also need to be available. For server and AI infrastructure projects, networking, power, cooling, and installation requirements should be considered alongside the hardware purchase so the delivery date reflects the complete project.
Configuration flexibility can help, provided the alternatives are evaluated properly. An organization may have room to change a processor model, storage capacity, or manufacturer without compromising its requirements. In other cases, application certification, compatibility, or existing support standards will make those specifications essential. Working through those distinctions early gives IT time to approve suitable alternatives before an expiring quote or unavailable component forces a rushed decision.
Make sure the quote window matches your approval process
USI quotes are valid for seven days, while some vendors offer windows as short as one to three days. Lenovo server quotes can carry 30-day validity, which provides useful protection during an approval process. That longer window does not mean underlying costs have stopped changing. Lenovo may absorb cost changes within the applicable quote period, while a new quote issued after expiration can reflect a different price.
Price protection and inventory availability also need to be checked separately. A valid quote does not necessarily mean equipment has been reserved, and shipment delays may introduce conditions that buyers need to understand before placing an order. Before approving a purchase, ask:
When does the quote expire? Establish whether the organization can complete its approvals within that window.
Is inventory available and allocated? Confirm whether stock is reserved for the order or remains available to other buyers.
What happens if shipment is delayed? Review any terms allowing repricing, cancellation, or component substitution.
Are there other price-adjustment conditions? Ask how tariff or similar language applies to the specific order.
These details are easier to manage when IT, procurement, finance, and leadership understand the timing from the beginning. If approval normally takes several weeks, bring that into the initial conversation with your hardware partner. There may be opportunities to coordinate quote timing, establish acceptable alternatives, or arrange approvals around a defined budget. Without that coordination, teams can spend time approving equipment that is no longer available at the price they reviewed.
Build hardware procurement around the refresh plan
For an upcoming refresh, start by revisiting the assumptions behind the budget. An estimate from August may need updating before it becomes a purchase request, particularly for servers and systems with substantial memory or storage requirements. From there, prioritize replacements based on operational need, review configuration options, and decide whether the project should proceed on its current schedule. Delaying a purchase can be reasonable, but that decision should account for the condition of the existing equipment and the consequences of keeping it in service.
Recurring hardware needs deserve the same attention. Hiring plans, device replacement schedules, and new locations can provide enough visibility to establish standard configurations and plan inventory before individual requests arrive. Our work with United Energy Workers Healthcare illustrates how approved device packages and planned inventory can support employee onboarding across a distributed organization. The appropriate stocking model will vary by customer, but a known requirement gives everyone more room to plan than a series of emergency orders.
Support should remain part of that decision even when acquisition costs are rising. Removing warranty coverage or buying from an unfamiliar seller may reduce the initial price while creating additional repair, downtime, or replacement exposure later. Our articles on three-year business laptop warranty coverage and the risks of buying business PCs online explain the questions worth asking before making those tradeoffs.
The current market makes early planning more valuable because it preserves time to adjust a budget, validate a configuration, or find another source. At Universal Systems, our Hardware & Devices team helps organizations connect those purchasing decisions with deployment and long-term support requirements. If you have a refresh approaching or an older quote behind your budget, talk with us about your plans. We can help establish what is available, what it costs today, and which alternatives are worth considering.
← All insights
© 2026 Universal Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.